Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1406
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, N.R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSirisena, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGunasekera, D.P.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIsmail, M.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, H.J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-29T09:18:24Z
dc.date.available2014-10-29T09:18:24Z
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier.citationLancet. 1999; 353(9159): pp.1145-1149en_US
dc.identifier.issn0140-6736 (Print)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1474-547X (Electronic)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1406
dc.descriptionIndexed in MEDLINE
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: In areas endemic for hookworm, routine antenatal mebendazole therapy could greatly reduce the prevalence of anaemia in pregnancy. At present, however, this is not a widely accepted control strategy because of a lack of data on the safety of the drug. We assessed the effect of mebendazole therapy during pregnancy on birth outcome. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was done in Sri Lanka, where prescription of mebendazole to women in the second trimester of pregnancy is recommended. Two hospitals were chosen for the study, and women who gave birth there between May, 1996, and March, 1997, were recruited. We compared the rates of major congenital defects, stillbirth, perinatal death, and low birthweight (less or equal 1500 g) among babies of mothers who had taken mebendazole during pregnancy with those whose mothers had not taken an anthelmintic (controls). FINDINGS: The rate of major congenital defects was not significantly higher in the mebendazole group than in the control group (97 [1.8 percent] of 5275 vs 26 [1.5 percent] of 1737; odds ratio 1.24 [95 percent CI 0.8-1.91], p equal 0.39). Among 407 women who had taken mebendazole in the first trimester (contrary to medical advice), 10 (2.5 percent) had major congenital defects (odds ratio vs controls 1.66 [0.81-3.56], p equal 0.23). The proportions of stillbirths and perinatal deaths were significantly lower in the mebendazole group (1.9 vs 3.3 percent, 0.55 [95 percent CI 0.4-0.77]), as was the proportion of low-birthweight babies (1.1 vs 2.3 percent 0.47 [95 percent CI 0.32-0.71]). INTERPRETATION: Mebendazole therapy during pregnancy is not associated with a significant increase in major congenital defects, but our results indicate that it should be avoided during the first trimester. This therapy could offer beneficial effects to pregnant women in developing countries, where intestinal helminthiases are endemic.en_US
dc.publisherLancet Publishing Groupen_US
dc.subjectAntinematodal Agentsen_US
dc.subjectPregnancy Complications, Parasiticen_US
dc.subjectAntinematodal Agents-adverse effectsen_US
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studiesen_US
dc.subjectHookworm Infections-drug therapyen_US
dc.subjectMebendazole-adverse effectsen_US
dc.subjectPregnancy Complications, Parasiticen_US
dc.subjectPregnancy Outcomeen_US
dc.subjectAntinematodal Agentsen_US
dc.subjectMebendazoleen_US
dc.subjectInfant, Newbornen_US
dc.titleEffect of mebendazole therapy in pregnancy on birth outcomeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.departmentParasitologyen_US
dc.identifier.departmentMedicineen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.