Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/13786
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDeen, K.I.
dc.contributor.authorPremaratna, R.
dc.contributor.authorFonseka, M.M.D.
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, H.J.
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-10T06:35:30Z
dc.date.available2016-07-10T06:35:30Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.citationGut 1997; 40 (suppl 1):A52en_US
dc.identifier.issn0017-5749 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn1468-3288 (Electronic)
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/13786
dc.descriptionAbstract(TH206), Diamond Jubilee Meeting of the British Society of Gastroenterology, 18th 21st March, 1997, Brighton, Uken_US
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: The recto-anal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) is characterized by reflex relaxation of the anal canal in response to electrical stimulation of the rectal mucosa, and is mediated by nitrergic neural plexuses within the gut wall. Impairment of this reflex may lead to incontinence. AIM: To measure anal canal pressures, anal mucosal electrosensation and RAIR in diabetic patients and correlate these measurements with incontinence for gas or faeces. METHODS: Anal canal pressure, RAIR and continence was evaluated in 30 diabetic patients [Male:Female=13:17, median age 57 years (range 37- 70)], and these data were compared with similar data obatained from 22 age and sex matched 'healthy' controls [Male:Female= 9:13, median age 51 years (range 19 - 65 )]. Median duration of diabetes was 8 years (range 3 -30 ). 12 (40%) of the 30 diabetics had impaired continence for gas (n=12) and liquid faeces (n=3). None ofthe controls had incontinence. RESULTS: Maximum resting anal canal pressure (MRP) was [median (range)]: Patients 30mmHg (20-75) vs. Controls 40mmHg (20-105), P=0.61. Maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) [median (range)]: Patients 65mmHg (30- 150) vs. Controls 84mmHg (35-230), P=0.59. Threshold rectal mucosal eletrosensation (RMES-T) [median (range)]: Patients 27 mA (5-40) vs. Controls l3mA (5-28), P=0.03. Maximum tolerable rectal mucosal electrosensation [median (range)]: Patients 40 mA (20-60) vs. Controls 20 mA (10-30), P=0.042 (all comparisons using Wilcoxon rank test). RAIR was present in 8, abnormal in 5 (1 with incontinence), and absent in 17 (II with incontinence) diabetics while it was present in 18 and abnormal in 4 controls (test of proportion, P=0.03 I). CONCLUSIONS: RAIR was impaired in significantly more patients with diabetes than controls implying impairment of intrinsic neuronal function. All diabetic patients with incontinence had impaired or absent RAIR. Impairment of this reflex may be a useful predictor of incontinence in diabetics.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishingen_US
dc.subjectRecto-Anal Inhibitory Reflexen_US
dc.subjectDiabetesen_US
dc.titleThe Recto-Anal Inhibitory Reflex (RAIR): abnormal response in diabetics suggests an intrinsic neuro-enteropathyen_US
dc.typeConference Abstracten_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Gut-1997-Premaratne-A52.pdf271.9 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.