One day general practice morbidity survey in Sri Lanka

Abstract

BACKGROUND: National morbidity surveys provide valuable data for monitoring the health needs of populations, health policy planning and design of medical curricula. In order to meet a long-standing need for such information in Sri Lanka, a nationwide general practice morbidity survey was conducted for the first time in 1996. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify people's needs by determining the reasons for encounter or the demand for care with GPs/family physicians, to illustrate the pattern of morbidity in general practice and to determine the average daily workload of GPs in Sri Lanka. METHOD: A random sample of 75 GPs were requested to complete a Practitioner Profile Questionnaire (PPQ) and to record on an encounter form (EF) the reason/s for encounter (RFE) and problems managed during all consultations on 4 July. Central coding of the RFEs and problems defined was done using the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC). RESULTS: Forty GPs (53.3 percent) completed the PPQ, while the EF received a response from 34 (43.3 percent). The GP profile showed a male to female ratio of 7:1, none below 35 years and none qualified after 1984. The average daily workload was 74. It was estimated that GPs handle at least 26.5percent of the primary care morbidity. Children accounted for 32 percent of consultations. There was a significantly higher proportion of children (P 0.0001) and of the elderly (P 0.05) in the consulting population compared with the general population. In 2068 encounters, 3448 RFEs and 2087 problems had been recorded. Respiratory and General chapters included 55 percent of the RFEs. By ICPC rubrics, 27 of the top thirty RFEs were for common symptoms. In addition to acute illnesses, asthma, hypertension and diabetes as well as preventive care activities were within the top 12 problems managed. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that many common illnesses, chronic diseases and preventive treatments are dealt with in general practice shows the necessity to include family medicine in the undergraduate curriculum of all medical schools. Undergraduate and postgraduate training in family medicine should concentrate more on child care and care of the elderly. Suitable incentives may be necessary to motivate younger doctors to become GPs to meet,the medical care needs of the community.