Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1348
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDeen, K.I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPremaratna, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFonseka, M.M.D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, H.J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-29T09:15:34Z
dc.date.available2014-10-29T09:15:34Z
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.1998; 13(11):1107-10en_US
dc.identifier.issn0815-9319 (Print)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1440-1746 (Electronic)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1348
dc.descriptionIndexed in MEDLINE
dc.description.abstractAs electrical stimulation of the rectum has been shown to result in reflex internal sphincter inhibition mediated by intrinsic nerves, we aimed to evaluate the integrity of these nerves in the rectum of diabetic patients. Anal canal pressure, recto-anal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) and continence were evaluated in 30 diabetic patients (male:female 13:17, median age 57 years, range 37-70) and these data were compared with similar data obtained from 22 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (male:female 9:13, median age 51 years, range 19-65 years). Median duration of diabetes was 8 years (range 3-30). Twelve (40 percent) of the 30 diabetics had impaired continence for gas (n = 12) and liquid faeces (n = 3). None of the controls had incontinence. Median maximum resting anal canal pressure (MRP) was: patients 30 mmHg (range 20-75 mmHg) versus controls 40 mmHg (range 20-105 mmHg, P = 0.61). Median maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) was 65 mmHg (range 30-150 mmHg) in patients versus 84mmHg (range 35-230 mm Hg) in controls (P = 0.59). Median threshold rectal mucosal electrosensation (RMES-T) was 27mA (5-40 mA) in patients versus 13 mA (5-28 mA) in controls (P = 0.03). Maximum tolerable rectal mucosal electrosensation was 40 mA (20-60) in patients versus 20 mA (10-30), in controls (P = 0.042, all comparisons using the Wilcoxon rank test). Recto-anal inhibitory reflex was present in eight, abnormal in five (one incontinent) and absent in 17 (11 incontinent) diabetics, while it was present in 18 and abnormal in four controls (test of proportion, P = 0.031). Blood glucose in diabetics on the day of the procedure was 98 mg/dL (70-165 mg/dL). Rectal mucosal electrosensitivity and RAIR were impaired in significantly more patients with diabetes than controls, implying impairment of intrinsic neuronal function. The recto-anal inhibitory reflex was either impaired or absent in all diabetic patients with incontinence.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Scientific Publicationsen_US
dc.subjectDiabetic Neuropathiesen_US
dc.subjectAnal Canal-innervationen_US
dc.subjectDiabetic Neuropathies-physiopathologyen_US
dc.subjectAutonomic Nervous System-physiopathologyen_US
dc.subjectRectum-innervationen_US
dc.subjectReflex-physiologyen_US
dc.subjectCase-Control Studiesen_US
dc.titleThe Recto-anal inhibitory reflex: abnormal response in diabetics suggests an intrinsic neuroenteropathyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.departmentSurgeryen_US
dc.identifier.departmentMedicineen_US
dc.creator.corporateauthorAsian Pacific Association of Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.creator.corporateauthorAsian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liveren_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.