Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/13307
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Pinidiyapathirage, M.J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wimalarathne, O. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gunasekara, W.P.A.D. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-31T04:01:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-05-31T04:01:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The Bulletin of the Sri Lanka College of Microbiologists. 2006; 04(1): 17 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1391-930x | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/13307 | - |
dc.description | Oral Presentation (OP 07) The bulletin of the Sri Lanka College of Microbiologists, 21st-23rd September 2006, Colombo | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: With increased availability, accessibility and safety of rabies post exposure treatment (PET), costs borne by the Government in the purchase of anti-rabies vaccines have increased dramatically. This study was conducted to identify exposure characteristics of patients presenting to an anti-rabies treatment unit (ARU) and to propose measures that could minimise PET use. METHOD: A hospital based descriptive study was carried out in the ARU of the National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL), An interviewer administered questionnaire assessed socio-demographic characteristics and the nature of exposure of patients. Treatment received was obtained from patient records. RESULTS: All consenting, first visit patients (n-266) presented during a period of one week to the ARU with an exposure history to a suspected rabid animal were studied. Mean age of those exposed was 36.6 years (SD 16.6). Exposure to dogs (208, 78.2%) was the commonest followed by exposure to cats (33, 12.4%). Majority were exposed to domesticated animals (172, 64.7%) which were unvaccinated or did not have reliable proof of vaccination (167, 62.8%). Of the 266, 13 (4.9%) did not need PET, 51 (19.2%) needed both anti-rabies inactivated tissue culture vaccine (ARV) and anti rabies serum and202(75.9%) needed ARV only. CONCLUSION: Majority of the exposures that needed PET was to domesticated dogs which were unvaccinated or had no reliable proof of vaccination. Importance of regular vaccination of pets and safe-keeping of animal vaccination records should be stressed to the general public and awareness of responsible pet ownership should be raised among the public. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Sri Lanka College of Microbiologists | en_US |
dc.subject | anti-rabies treatment | en_US |
dc.title | Exposure characteristics of patients presenting to an anti-rabies treatment unit | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Conference Papers |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.