Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1189
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDeen, K.I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOya, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKeighley, M.R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-29T09:10:58Z-
dc.date.available2014-10-29T09:10:58Z-
dc.date.issued1993en_US
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Surgery. 1993; 80(6): pp.794-798en_US
dc.identifier.issn0007-1323 (Print)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2168 (Electronic)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1189-
dc.descriptionIndexed in MEDLINE-
dc.description.abstractA randomized controlled trial in women with neuropathic faecal incontinence compared total pelvic floor repair (n = 12) with anterior levatorplasty and sphincter plication alone (n = 12) and postanal repair alone (n = 12). Review at 6 and 24 months indicated that results were significantly better for total pelvic floor repair than either of the other procedures. Comlete continence was achieved in eight of the 12 patients 2 years after total pelvic floor repair. Only total repair significantly elongated the anal canal. Both total pelvic floor repair and anterior levatorplasty improved sensation in the upper anal canal.en_US
dc.subjectClinical Trial-
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trial-
dc.subjectFecal Incontinence-
dc.subjectFecal Incontinence-physiopathology-
dc.subjectFecal Incontinence-surgery-
dc.subjectAnal Canal-physiopathology-
dc.subjectDefecation-physiology-
dc.subjectMuscles-surgery-
dc.subjectPelvis-surgery-
dc.subjectRectum-physiopathology-
dc.titleRandomized trial comparing three forms of pelvic floor repair for neuropathic faecal incontinenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.departmentSurgeryen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.