Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/10952
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRanawaka, C.K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, A.P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorde Alwis, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWaraketiya, P.R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJayathilake, T.M.A.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNiriella, M.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDassanayake, A.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHewavisenthi, S.J.de S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, H.J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-24T13:40:27Zen_US
dc.date.available2015-12-24T13:40:27Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2012; 27(Supp 5): 315en_US
dc.identifier.issn0815-9319 (Print)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1440-1746 (Electronic)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/10952en_US
dc.descriptionPoster Session Abstract (P15-07), 22nd Asian Pacific Digestive Week, December 5–8, 2012, Bangkok, Thailanden_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND AIM: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is increasing in the West (community prevalence 0.02–1%). It is especially prevalent among patients with refractory upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms (8.8–48%). Diagnosis is important as the treatment is with corticosteroids and other immunomodulators rather than acid suppression and prokinetics. EOE has been poorly studied in Asian populations. Our aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of EoE among adult Sri Lankan patients with refractory UGI symptoms. METHODS: The study was carried out in the University Medical Unit, Colombo North Teaching Hospital, Ragama, Sri Lanka. Over a period of one year from March 2011, consecutive, consenting patients (aged 18–70) referred for gastroduodenoscopy (OGD); with persistent UGI symptoms despite standard therapy for at least two months were recruited. Patients without significant abnormalities other than features of EoE on OGD underwent two biopsies each from the distal and mid oesophagus. Biopsies were obtained from duodenum and stomach at the same time to rule out possible eosonophilic gastroenteritis. A diagnosis of EoE was made when there were 15 or more intra-epithelial eosinophils per high-power field, according to the international guidelines. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Common refractory symptoms were dyspepsia, gastro-oesophageal refl ux and dysphagia in 74, 64, 27 respectively. Only 106 patients (M: F = 42:64 mean age 48 yrs (SD 13.3) who fulfill the criteria underwent oesophageal biopsies. Endoscopy was macroscopically normal in 98 patients and suggestive of EoE in 8; concentric mucosal rings in 2 and white exudates in 6 patients. Only 2 (1.9%) patients had histological evidence of EoE, both had symptoms of refractory dyphagia and one had compatible macroscopic endoscopic features of EoE (concentric mucosal rings). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of EoE in this Sri Lankan cohort of adult patients with refractory UGI symptoms was much lower than reported in Western seriesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWiley Blackwell Scientific Publicationsen_US
dc.subjectEosinophilic Esophagitisen_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen_US
dc.subjectGastrointestinal Diseasesen_US
dc.titlePrevalence of eosinophilic oesophagitis among adult Sri Lankan patients with refractory upper gastrointestinal symptoms: a prospective studyen_US
dc.typeConference Abstracten_US
dc.creator.corporateauthorAsian Pacific Association of Gastroenterologyen
dc.creator.corporateauthorAsian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liveren
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.