Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/10623
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, A.P.
dc.contributor.authorNandamuni, Y.
dc.contributor.authorRajapakshe, N.N.
dc.contributor.authorNanayakkara, S.
dc.contributor.authorPerera, K.R.
dc.contributor.authorKodisinghe, S.K.
dc.contributor.authorSubasinghe, S.K.C.
dc.contributor.authorNiriella, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorDassanayake, A.S.
dc.contributor.authorPathmeswaran, A.
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, H.J.
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T07:07:40Z
dc.date.available2015-12-07T07:07:40Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the Sri Lanka Medical Association, Anniversary Academic Sessions. 2015; 60(sup 1): 147en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/10623
dc.descriptionOral Presentation Abstract (OP56), 128th Annual Scientific Sessions, Sri Lanka Medical Association, 6th-8th July 2015 Colombo, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Colonoscopy can cause discomfort and anxiety in patients. Heavy sedation as premedication can lead to complications in elderly and those with co-morbidities. This has led to possible use of audio-visual distraction during the procedure. We compared effects of audio versus visual distraction in reducing discomfort during colonoscopy. METHOD: 131 consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy were randomized into three groups: allowed to listen to music of their choice during colonoscopy (AD), allowed to watch a film of their choice (VD) and neither as control (C). Patient controlled sedation (PCS) was administered to all three groups; 25 mg pethidine in 5 mg aliquots and 2.5 mg midazolam in 0.5 mg aliquots. All patients were assessed for pain, number of 'top-ups' of sedation, total dose of pethidine and midazolam and patient cooperation and willingness for a repeat procedure. RESULTS: There were 131 patients (AD=43; VD=44; O44). The AD group had significantly less pain and discomfort (p=0.033) compared to VD and Cgroups. There was no significant difference in number of 'top-ups' of sedation, total doses of pethidine and midazolam among the groups. Better patient cooperation (p=0.002) was evident in ADgroup compared with VD and C groups. There was nt> difference between the AD and VD groups in willingness to undergo a repeat procedure. CONCLUSION: Listening to music of your choice during colonoscopy seems to reduce pain and discomfort and increase the patients' cooperation. This may be a useful and simple tool in screening colonoscopy.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSri lanka Medical Associationen_US
dc.subjectvisual distractionen_US
dc.titleA randomized control study of audio versus visual distraction to reduce patient discomfort during colonoscopyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.