Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/10033
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKasturiratne, A.-
dc.contributor.authorAriyaratne, M.A.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorWickremasinghe, A.R.-
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-13T06:06:04Z-
dc.date.available2015-10-13T06:06:04Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationThe Ceylon Medical Journal. 2008; 53(Supplement 1):38en_US
dc.identifier.issn0009-0875 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/10033-
dc.descriptionOral Presentation Abstract (OP49), 121st Annual Scientific Sessions, Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2008 Colombo, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Oral cancer is the commonest cancer among men and the second commonest overall in Sri Lanka. Obj ective: To determine the survival pattern and prognostic factors of oral cancer. DESIGN, SETTING AND METHODS: A cohort of patients who were treated for oral cancer at the National Cancer Institute, Maharagama (NCIM) from 1991 to 2000 was traced to their homes to obtain socio-demographic and survival information. Disease and treatment related information were extracted from patient records. The survival of untraced patients was taken up to the last day of contact and censored. RESULTS: Of the 750 patients [mean age-60.6 (SD=11.2) years; males=77.9%] studied, 548 (73.1%) were traced. 465 were dead, and 83 patients were alive on lsl January 2006. Overall 5-year survival rate was 24%. Patients diagnosed in early stages and who underwent surgery had a significantly higher median survival. Overall survival was significantly better in patients who were diagnosed early, patients who had surgery and in patients diagnosed between 1991-1995. The survival probabilities at selected time points were significantly different between patients diagnosed early vs. late, who received surgery vs. not, and patients with cancers of the oral cavity vs. cancers of the oro-pharynx. Age (hazards ratio (HR)=1.01), stage at diagnosis (HR=2.34), waiting time for treatment (HR=0,99) and year of diagnosis (HR=1.21) were significantly associated with survival in Cox's regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Established prognostic factors like age, stage at diagnosis and waiting time for treatment are important in Sri Lanka. While the year of diagnosis needs further evaluation, early detection and prompt treatment will be very important for improving survival.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSri Lanka Medical Associationen_US
dc.subjectoral canceren_US
dc.titleSurvival pattern and prognostic factors of oral cancer in Sri Lankaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
OP 49.docx12.04 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.