COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL NATIONAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION NETWORK (NREN) CONSORTIUMS: COMPARING MEMBERSHIP, GOVERNANCE, FINANCING, AND REGIONAL CONTEXTS IN THE GLOBAL SCENARIO

Abstract

This research undertakes a comprehensive comparative analysis of regional National Research and Education Network (NREN) consortiums, examining critical elements such as membership criteria, governance models, financing mechanisms, and the influence of regional contexts. The objective is to delineate best practices and provide recommendations to enhance the effectiveness, inclusivity, and sustainability of NREN consortiums globally. The analysis reveals that NREN consortiums vary significantly in their membership criteria, with some offering multiple membership categories beyond the core NREN members. Governance models predominantly feature a Board of Directors, although community governance models are also practiced. Financing mechanisms primarily rely on membership and service fees, with some consortiums in lower-income regions benefiting from grant funding. Regional contexts play a crucial role in the formation and operation of NREN consortiums. Political stability and economic strength are notably higher in American and European regions compared to African and Asian regions, where conditions vary widely. Technological advancement and digital connectivity are also more developed in American and European regions, while cultural and social factors exhibit significant diversity across all regions. Based on these findings, the study recommends enhancing membership criteria to be more inclusive, adopting effective governance models, diversifying financing mechanisms, and tailoring strategies to regional contexts.