Digital Repository

Feminist research methodology: Making meanings of meaning-making

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wickremasinghe, Maithree
dc.date.accessioned 2015-09-28T04:38:28Z
dc.date.available 2015-09-28T04:38:28Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.identifier.citation Wickramesinghe, Maithree 2010. Feminist research methodology: Making meanings of meaning-making. London and New York: Routledge, 2010, 213 pp. en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-0-415-49416-8
dc.identifier.uri
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/9772
dc.description.abstract Mentioning the word ‘methodology’ in conversation often elicits passive disinterest at the least, and vocal disdain at the most. For those practising development, the term can conjure up images of flow charts, log frames and data sets, while for those in academia, dry lectures on regression analysis may come to mind. Despite the consideration given to the subject of methodology in various fields, however, very little has been written linking feminist methodologies to development practice (one exception being Volume 15, Issue 2 of this journal, to which the author of this review contributed), and there is an even greater gap in such literature published from the perspective of feminist researchers working in the global South, although there is likely much work published locally that has escaped the attention of Northern audiences. Sri Lankan academic and self-described feminist researcher, Maithree Wickramasinghe, sets out to address these gaps in her book, Feminist Methodology: Making Meanings of Meaning-making, published by Routledge as the second book in its Research on Gender in Asia series. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Routledge en_US
dc.title Feminist research methodology: Making meanings of meaning-making en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account