Symposia & Conferences
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/2422
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item A Comparative Analysis of Symbols and Motifs in Jain and Buddhist Religions(Centre for Asian Studies, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, 2017) Prakash, R.The history of human thought discloses that man has been in constant search of truth and happiness. There are times when we do not understand what is being meant by a word, a thought, an act, or a thing. We need other things to describe them in order to properly understand their meanings. This is particularly true when we are dealing with works of art in the literary world. This is why symbols and motifs are created: to help us understand. The Jain Symbol is a congregation of various symbols, each having a deeper meaning. Many Buddhist symbols need to be considered within the culture of the people who follow it. Therefore, many of the early symbols relate to ancient India and can be found in Hinduism as well, although possibly with a somewhat different meaning. It is said that the Buddha was reluctant to accept images of himself as he did not like to be venerated as a person. To symbolise the Buddha in the very early art, one used mainly the Eight Spoked Wheel and the Bodhi Tree, but also the Buddha's Footprints, an Empty Throne, a Begging Bowl and a Lion are used to represent him. A motif is an image, spoken or written word, sound, act, or another visual or structural device that has symbolic significance. It is used to develop and inform the theme of a literary work. The concept of a motif is related to a theme, but unlike a theme which is an idea or message, a motif is a detail that is repeated in a pattern of meaning that can produce a theme while creating other aspects at the same time. The present research is thus based on all these important issues based on archaeological evidence and literary sources.Item An Inquiry into Likelihood of Religious Pluralism in Buddhism(Centre for Asian Studies, University of Kelaniya, 2015) Kumara, V.The well-known fact is that the Buddhism emerged in a multi-religious society in the 6th century BC in India. But, it guides explicitly how to practice harmony amongst other religious followers. It doesn’t mean that it is impossible to observe Buddhist criticism towards the contemporary heretical views in India. The notable fact, in this regard is that the remorseless Buddhist criticism aimed at the practitioners of self-indulgence only. Even though, the Buddha and his disciples experienced a number of difficulties from the other religious groups, they practiced religious harmony constantly. The attitudes of the Buddha towards Jains, Śramaṇa practitioners, and well-versed Brahmanas imply how Buddhism practiced religious tolerance. The tolerance cannot be defined that a religion accepts what opposing religion teaches. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the religious pluralism goes far beyond the tolerance. The aim of this paper is to prove that the Buddhism manifests pluralistic teachings in different layers while it presents the nonsoul theory as its unique teaching. Particularly, the sources utilized in this research will be limited to the Sutta-piṭaka only.