Conference Papers
Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6561
This collection contains abstracts of conference papers, presented at local and international conferences by the staff of the Faculty of Medicine
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item Why do people travel upto 70km to seek treatment from the Colombo North Teaching Hospital Outpatient Department? A qualitative study(Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2018) Perera, D.P.; Withana, S.S.; Mendis, K.M.; Kasunjith, D.V.T.; Jayathilaka, W.T.S.; Wickramasuriya, S.W.; Govinthadas, S.; Kalansooriya, R.; Welhenage, C.INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Bypassing nearby primary care facilities to seek treatment from teaching/general hospital OPDs is a known challenge to the equitable distribution of healthcare. A 2017 morbidity study at CNTH OPD showed that 25.3% travelled distances more than lOkm to visit the OPD. Our aim was to understand why patients travel straight line distances more than lOkm to seek healthcare from the CNTH OPD.METHODS: Four trained medical student interviewers conducted individual in-depth interviews with patients attending the CNTH OPD from a distance of more than lOkm. Interviews were conducted in Sinhala/Tamil, recorded, transcribed and translated to English prior to inductive thematic analysis until there was saturation of themes.RESULTS: Participants were 13 female and 10 male patients from 24 to 68 years; from distances of 12km to 69km. Significant driving factors that emerged were a) trust in the quality of care arising from prior satisfactory experience and social perceptions, b) efficient administration and better facilities, c) perceived severity of the illness, d) reluctance to seek treatment from nearby healthcare facilities due to perceived inefficiencies in administration, lack of facilities and poor service delivery, e) ease of access using the train system, f) familiarity with the institution and personal connections with staff members and g) incidental visits to CNTH or Ragama town not related to healthcare.CONCLUSION: Patients appear to make calculated decisions on which healthcare facility to attend based on the desire to receive the best care possible. However, some visits were inappropriate and contributed to unnecessary overcrowding of the OPD.Item Morbidity pattern and process of care at a teaching hospital outpatient department in Sri Lanka(Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2017) Mendis, K.; de Silva, A.H.W.; Perera, D.P.; Withana, S.S.; Premasiri, B.H.S.; Jayakodi, S.INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: There is paucity of published data regarding outpatient department (OPD) morbidity in spite of 55 million OPD visits to government hospitals in 2014. OPD morbidity has been assumed to be similar to indoor morbidity for two decades. The recent Ministry of Health focus to strengthen primary care skills of medical graduates, requires reliable data from primary care to align medical curricula towards this goal. This is an initial step to identify the primary care morbidity profile. METHODS: In a cross-sectional pilot study doctors trained as data collectors observed a representative sample of doctor patient encounters and recorded the reason for encounters (RFE) and process of care. The problem definition (PD) was provided by the consulting doctor. RFEs and PDs were later coded using International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC2). Analysis was done using ‘R Ver3.2.3’ programming language. RESULTS: A total of 2923 clinical encounters resulted in 5626 RFEs and 3051 health problems. Patients mean age was 39.1(±22) with 64.5% females. Top ranking PDs were (n=3051): acute upper respiratory infection (11.3%), other respiratory infection (8.1%), viral fever (4.7%), lower respiratory tract infection (4.7%), muscle symptoms and complaints (3.8%), gastritis (3.3%), bronchial asthma (2.6%), dermatitis (2.5%), fungal infections (1.6%) back pain (1.5%), sinusitis (1.4%), joint pains (1.2%) and tonsillitis (1.2%). Psychological problems accounted for 0.4% and no social problems were recorded. During 2923 encounters, 540 (18%) were referred to clinics and 66 (2.3%) admitted to hospital. Prescriptions were issued for 2349 (80%), examination carried out in 2322 (79%), advice given to 946 (32%) and investigations ordered for 348 (12%). CONCLUSION: The morbidity pattern of OPD patients is different from inpatients - almost two thirds were females and more than 30% were respiratory problems.Item Structured Referral Form: is it a solution for problems of referral communication in Sri Lanka(Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2014) Ramanayake, R.P.J.C.; Sumanasekera, R.D.N.; de Silva, A.H.W.; Perera, D.P.INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Referral letters convey information required for continuity of care when patients are referred to a hospital or a specialist. In Sri Lanka conventional, hand written letters are used for patient referrals and there is no standard format or widely accepted guidelines. This study was conducted to explore the acceptability, advantages and limitations of a structured referral form for General Practitioners. METHODS: A referral form was designed based on literature review and guidelines. Printed referral forms were provided to 20 general practices representing different background. Telephone interviews were conducted at the end of 3 months to obtain their views on the format. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and themes identified. RESULTS: It has improved the comprehensiveness of letters and saved time. Overall quality of letters improved and participants were of the view that it could be used in any instance, language competency was immaterial and retrieval of information would be easier. Inadequate space under a few subheadings was a limitation. There was no increase in reply letters after introducing this letter. Participants were willing to use the format in the future as well. CONCLUSIONS: This is a useful and acceptable tool to improve information transfer and it will also be a reminder and guide for doctors to include all information. It could be a solution to the problems of communication in patient relevant in Sri Lanka.Item Views of Specialists and General Practitioners regarding referral process in Sri Lanka(Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2014) Ramanayake, R.P.J.C.; Sumanasekera, R.D.N.; de Silva, A.H.W.; Perera, D.P.INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Sri Lanka has an impressive healthcare system, despite the lack of a system for registering patients under healthcare providers and no established referral and back referral system. In referring patients in Sri Lanka, communication between General Practitioners (GPs) and specialists take place mostly via letters. METHODS: A descriptive cross sectional study using self-administered questionnaires explored views of specialists and GPs on the referral process. RESULTS: Island wide, 20% of 1100 specialists representing 28 specialties invited to participate responded According to specialists, referral letters were few in number and poor in quality. Specialists expected comprehensive referrals describing the problem, patient and administrative details. Few replied to referrals and reasons stated were; time constrains, lack of secretarial support, perceptions such as the letter will not reach the GP, no benefit to GP or patient. Response rate from general practitioners was 28.7%. Less than-60% always wrote a referral letter. Reasons for not writing referral letters were; lack of ownership to non-regular patients, no feedback from specialists and patients insistence on referral without an indication. GPs stated that reply rate was poor irrespective of referral destination and main items of information expected following a referral were a reply letter with diagnosis, plan of management and instructions to the GP. CONCLUSIONS: Both groups agree that there should be better communication and coordination between GPs and specialists/hospital doctors. Ways to improve communication should be explored and rectifying measures should be undertaken.