Conference Papers

Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6561

This collection contains abstracts of conference papers, presented at local and international conferences by the staff of the Faculty of Medicine

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Changes in biochemical markers of outcomes in haemodialysis patients following a clinical pharmacy intervention.
    (Ceylon College of Physicians, 2021) Kalpani, A.G.S.; Mohamed, F.; Hough, J.E.; de Silva, D.N.N.; Chandrasena, W.M.H.N.M.; Jayamanne, S.F.
    Introduction and Objectives Common complications of End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) include cardiovascular disease, diabetes, anaemia and mineral and bone disease. Achieving an optimum level of biochemical markers of outcomes is crucial in managing ESRD. This study was conducted to assess the changes in selected biochemical parameters following a clinical pharmacy intervention (CPI) in this population. Method A randomized controlled trial was conducted at outpatient haemodialysis units in North Central Province, Sri Lanka. Serum phosphate, serum calcium, haemoglobin, lipid profile, eGFR and 'adequacy of dialysis* (AoD) (determined by urea reduction ratio (URR); calculated based on pre-post blood urea nitrogen measurements and Kt/V measurements) were measured in patients at baseline (BL) and after one year (PI). The Intervention Group (IG), n=143 patients received comprehensive pharmaceutical care by the clinical pharmacist on four consecutive occasions at recruitment, and 2, 6 and 10 months after recruitment. While the Control Group (CG), n=140, received standard care. Results At the baseline, there was no significant difference in the biochemical markers of outcomes between the two groups and AoD was within the acceptable range. However, there was a significant improvement in the mean serum phosphate levels (IG 4.04±1.19 vs CG 5.00±1.67, p<0.0001), mean serum calcium levels (IG 8.90±1.35 vs CG 7.11±2.07, p<0.0001), and mean haemoglobin levels (IG 10.5±1.25 vs CG 9.4±1.87, p<0.0001) in the IG compared to the CG at the end of one year. However, eGFR, lipid profiles did not change significantly (p>0.05). AoD was within the acceptable range in both groups at baseline and post intervention and did not change significantly (p>0.05) Conclusions Improvement in the selected biochemical markers of outcomes resulting from CPI suggests better patient management outcomes in the ESRD population.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Opportunities for optimization of drug therapy and characterization of drug-related problems in ckd/ckdu patients undergoing hemodialysis in Sri Lanka
    (Ceylon College of Physicians, 2021) Kalpani, A.G.S.; Mohamed, F.; Hough, J.E.; de Silva, D.N.N.; Jayamanne, S.F.
    Introduction and objectives Drug-related problems (DRPs) in ESRD patients undergoing haemodialysis have not been investigated in Sri Lanka. The present study was conducted to identify and characterize the potential drug-related problems and identify opportunities to optimize drug therapy in ESRD patients undergoing haemodialysis. Method As part of RCT at ambulatory hemodialysis (HD) units of Teaching Hospital Anuradhapura (THA) and District General Hospital (DGH) Polonnaruwa, randomly selected ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis were recruited for the study. DRPs were identified by reviewing the clinic drug charts, patient clinic records and structured interviews with patients or caregivers to identify the patients* actual drug-taking behaviour. Identified DRPs were categorized using a PCNE classification system V.08. Results A total of 1350 drug related problems were identified in 283 ambulatory HD patients during the study period. Patients were taking an average of 10.64 drugs and had 4.77 DRPs. Unnecessary drug treatment (30.3%), effect of the drug treatment not optimal (29.9%) followed by untreated symptom or indication (24.5%) were the most prevalent DRP categories according to the PCNE classification system. The major cause for the identified DRPs was a prescriber related (50.22%) followed by patient related (30.0%) and dispensing related (16.9%) causes in ESRD patients undergoing HD. Conclusions ESRD patients undergoing HD had a large number of medications which increases the risk of potential DRPs. Significant opportunities exist for pharmacists' input to improve the quality use of medicines by identifying and resolving the DRPs in ESRD patients undergoing haemodialysis in the current Sri Lankan government hospital setting as part of multidisciplinary team
  • Item
    Management of paracetamol overdose in primary care hospitals in Sri Lanka: Are all the transfers justifiable?
    (Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2018) Pathiraja, V. M.; Gawarammana, I. B.; Buckley, N. A.; Mohamed, F.; Jayamanna, S. F.; Dawson, A. H.
    INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: National guidelines on the management of self-poisoning allows treatment of paracetamol poisoning in rural hospitals. Non-adherence to these guidelines may lead to unnecessary and costly transfers to larger referral hospitals. The objective of this study was to investigate if non-adherence to guidelines is justifiable.METHODS: In a prospective study, data was linked between primary and tertiary hospitals in Kurunegala and Matara districts. We examined the transfer patterns to two tertiary hospitals (THK and THM) and attempted to justify if the transfers were necessary.RESULT: There were 3129 admissions to primary hospitals and 904 (29%) patients were transferred to THK (809)and THM (95). The reason for transfer was mentioned as antidote requirement in 297, and in 607, antidote treatment was not mentioned as the reason for transfer. There was a significant difference of the median number of tablets ingested between those who had a reason mentioned 23 (IQR=18-30) and otherwise 21.5 (IQR 13-28) (p<0.000).485 (54%) were given an antidote at the tertiary care hospitals. 398 (44%) patients were not given an antidote andshould not have been transferred. Of the 297, who were transferred for antidotes, 147 (60%) were given antidotes and 51 were lost to follow up. Of those 607 who were transferred for other reasons, 238(48%) received antidotes and 112 were lost to follow up.CONCLUSION: Large numbers of patients who do not require treatment are transferred. A significant number of patients who require antidotes are not treated in the primary hospitals. This reflects that understanding treatment guidelines is poor.
  • Item
    A case series of duplication errors due to brand name confusion - experience from a Sri Lankan teaching hospital
    (Sri lanka Medical Association, 2015) Mamunuwa, A.M.V.G.N.; Jayamanne, S.F.; Coombes, J.; Lynch, C.B.; Perera, D.M.P.; Pathiraja, V.M.; Shanika, L.G.T.; Mohamed, F.; Dawson, A.H.
    INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Confusion with drug names has been identified as a leading cause of medication errors. The majority of these errors result from look-alike or sound-alike drugs. This case series aims to provide examples of duplication errors due to brand confusion where there are no similarities in the names. METHOD: Information for this case series was extracted from a database prospectively collected from Colombo North Teaching Hospital as part of a study conducted to evaluate the impact of the addition of a clinical pharmacist to the standard inpatient care. RESULTS: Of 800 patients reviewed during the study period of 7 months, clinical pharmacist identified 8 cases of duplication errors due to prescribing both generic and brand names of the same drug, but with no similarities in names. Cases identified include a duplication of frusemide caused by the lack of awareness that 'Amifru' {a combination of frusemide and amiloride) contains frusemide. Similarly, a patient was prescribed 'H. Pylori Kit' plus the three individual drugs included in the 'Kif prescribed using their generic names. A patient was found to be taking two different brands of carbidopa plus levodopa not knowing the two contained the same drugs. CONCLUSION: Brand confusion does not necessarily arise from look-alike or sound-alike drug names. It can be due to numerous brands of generic ingredients and lack of awareness of drug names among the patients. Employing trained clinical pharmacists in the wards, educating patients on discharge drugs and appropriate labeling of medicines may prevent these errors.
  • Item
    Importance of communicating medication changes to patients at discharge -a prospective case study
    (Sri lanka Medical Association, 2015) Pathiraja, V.M.; Jayamanne, S.F.; Lynch, C.B.; Coombes, J.; Perera, D.M.P.; Mamunuwa, A.M.V.G.N.; Shanika, L.G.T.; Mohamed, F.; Dawson, A.H.
    INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Patients may inadvertently continue their previous medication regimen without understanding changes made by prescribers as part of in-patient care. Inadequate patient education at discharge can lead in some instances to readmission and increased morbidity. The objective of this study is to identify the importance of patient education with regard to changes to their medications. METHOD: This study was part of a prospective study carried out in two medical wards of Ragama teaching hospital to evaluate the effect of a clinical pharmacist's interventions on quality use of medicines. We identified cases from the control group of this study to illustrate the importance of patient education at discharge. RESULTS: From telephone follow-up (six days post discharge), only 89 of 337 patients in the control group reported being informed of changes to their pre-admission medications by a doctor or nurse. There were!24 cases where we have identified patients continuing at least one pre-admission medication which was stopped or changed while they were in hospital. A particular instance is a patient who continued to take sodium valproate post-discharge as per previous drug regimen after being diagnosed with valproate induced hepatitis. He was discharged on phenytoin. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of ensuring patient education about changes made to existing medications whilst in hospital to ensure improved outcomes and reduce the risk of adverse events. The clinical pharmacist is well placed to assist medical teams by providing patients with appropriate education about medication changes and to provide appropriate educational material.