Conference Papers
Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6561
This collection contains abstracts of conference papers, presented at local and international conferences by the staff of the Faculty of Medicine
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Development of a Snakebite risk map for Sri Lanka(Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2016) Ediriweera, D.S.; Kasturiratne, A.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Gunawardena, N.K.; Wijayawickrama, B.A.; Jayamanne, S.F.; Isbister, G.K.; Dawson, A.; Giorgi, E.; Diggle, P.J.; Lalloo, D.G.; de Silva, H.J.INTRODUCTION: Snakebite is a public health problem in Sri Lanka and about 37,000 patients are treated in government hospitals annually. At present, health care resources which are required to manage snakebite are distributed based on the administrative boundaries, rather than based on scientific risk assessment. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to develop a snakebite risk map for Sri Lanka. METHOD: Epidemiological data was obtained from a community-based island-wide survey. The sample was distributed equally among the nine provinces. 165,665 participants (0.8%of the country’s population) living in 1118 Grama Niladhari divisions were surveyed. Generalized linear and generalized additive models were used for exploratory data analysis. Model-based geostatistics was used to determine the geographical distribution of snakebites. Monte Carlo maximum likelihood method was used to obtain parameter estimates and plug-in spatial predictions were obtained. Probability contour maps (PCM) were developed to demonstrate the spatial variation in the probability that local incidence does or does not exceed national snakebite incidence. RESULTS: Individual point estimate snakebite incidence map and PCM were developed to demonstrate the national incidence of snakebite in Sri Lanka. Snakebite hotspots and cold spots were identified in relation to the national snakebite incidence rate. Risk maps showed a within-country spatial variation in snakebites. CONCLUSIONS: The developed risk maps provide useful information for healthcare decision makers to allocate resources to manage snakebite in Sri Lanka.Item Community incidence of snakebite in the Amiradhapura district(Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2013) Kasturiratne, A.; Gunawardena, N.K.; Wijayawickrama, B.A.; Jayamanne, S.F.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Isbister, G.; Dawson, A.; de Silva, H.J.INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The community incidence of snakebite in Sri Lanka is unknown. To investigate incidence of snakebite, we undertook a community study in the Anuradhapura district as part of an ongoing countrywide survey on snakebite. METHODS: The survey was designed to sample at least 1% of the population in each district Within the district, a Grama Niladhari (GN) division, was defined as a cluster for data collection. The number of clusters required to sample at least 1 % of the population was first determined, and clusters were then selected using simple random sampling. In each selected cluster 40 households were sampled consecutively from a random starting point. Population estimates of snakebite were constructed for the district. RESULTS: The Anuradhapura district has a total of 694 GN divisions, and 84 were surveyed. This included 3357 households and a population of 13,428 (1.6% of the district's population). Eightysix snakebites were reported within the last 12 months. Extrapolating this to the district (mid-year population=855,373), the estimated snakebites in Anuradhapura district was 5478. The crude community incidence of snakebite in the Anuradhapura district was 640.5 per 100, 000 population. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of snakebite in the community is high in the Anuradhapura district, with one in 156 persons bitten annually.Item Development and assessment of a psychological intervention for snakebite victims(Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2014) Wiiesinahe, C.A.; Williams, S.S.; Dolawatta, N.; Wimalaratne, A.K.G.P.; Kasturiratne, A.; Wijewickrema, B.; Jayamanne, S.F.; Lalloo, D.G.; Isbister, G.K.; Dawson, A.; de Silva, H.J.INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There is significant delayed psychological morbidity and negative psycho-social impact following snakebite. However, no psychological support is provided to victims. We aimed to develop and assess the effectiveness of a brief intervention which can be provided by non-specialist medical officers aimed at reducing psychological morbidity. METHODS: In a single blind clinical trial at Polonnaruwa Hospital, 187 snakebite victims were randomised into three arms. One arm received no psychological intervention (Group A; n=59; control). Group B (n=60) received psychoeducation at discharge from hospital. Group C (n=68) received psychoeducation and a.second intervention one month later based on cognitive behavioural principles. All patients were assessed six months after discharge from hospital using standardised tools for presence of psychological symptoms and level of functioning. RESULTS: Compared with Group A, there was a significant reduction in anxiety symptoms measured by the Hopkins Psychiatric Symptom check list (16.9% vs. 5.9%, p=0.047, Chi-Squared test) and a non-significant trend towards improvement in the level of functioning measured by the Sheehan Disability inventory (6.47 vs. 4.69) in Group C, but not in Group B. There was no difference in rates of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary findings suggest that brief psychological interventions which include psychoeducation plus cognitive behavioural therapy given by non-specialist doctors, but not psychoeducation alone seem to reduce anxiety and facilitate a trend towards improved function in snakebite victims. However, these interventions had no effect on depression or PTSD.