Conference Papers
Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6561
This collection contains abstracts of conference papers, presented at local and international conferences by the staff of the Faculty of Medicine
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Improving quality of life after pouch surgery with a dedicated nurse led follow up programme(Wiely-Blackwell, 2016) Chandrasinghe, P.; Leo, A.; Alison, L.; Perry-Woodford, Z.; Warusavitarne, J.AIM:Bowel function after ileal pouch affects the quality of life (QOL). The aim of the study was to assess if objective evaluation and specialised supportive care improves QOL after pouch surgery.METHOD: Consecutive patients who had an ileoanal pouch were invited to participate in a systematic follow-up regime led by specialised pouch nurse practitioners. The Cleveland global Quality of Life (CGQOL) and specific pouch related symptoms were documented at 6, 12, 24 and 52 weeks after ileostomy reversal. Pearson's Rho coefficient was used to assess the correlation between symptoms and CGQOL. RESULTS: Thirty-nine consecutive patients who had ileoanal pouch surgery were evaluated. Thirty-four had more than two visits and improvement in CGQOL (mean-1.36 ± 0.95) was seen in 27 (79%). There was reduction in CGQOL in 5 patients (15%) and no change in 2 (6%). Daytime frequency (DTF) significantly correlated with mean CGQOL (R = −0.7, P < 0.01). Twenty (59%) of 34 had reduced DTF after intervention. Nocturnal frequency only showed correlation with CGQOL up to 3 months. Incontinence had no impact on the QOL in this cohort. CONCLUSION: DTF has the highest impact on QOL in this cohort. Regular systematic specialised pouch care follow up may achieve better QOL.Item Quality of life following curative surgery for colorectal cancer in a Sri Lankan cohort; North Colombo experience(Springer, 2021) Godahewa, S.; Gunasekare, K.; Gajasinghe, S.; Kumarage, S.; Chandrasinghe, P.BACKGROUND/AIM: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the 4th commonest cancer in Sri Lanka. It is increasingly approached with a curative intent due to the advancements in the surgical and medical management. This has resulted in a large cohort of cancer survivors that needs to be managed. Quality of life (QOL) and patient reported outcomes in CRC survivors assist in identifying and managing unique issues in this population. This study aims to describe objectively measured quality of life after surgery for colorectal cancer in a South Asian population. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for CRC and are currently disease free were included. QOL was assessed using the translated and validated SF36 questionnaire (Sinhala) along with patient complaints. SF36 components were aggregated into physical component summery (PCS) and mental component summery (MCS). Patient reported symptoms were categorized in to organ function, life style, and psycho-sexual. RESULTS: A Total of 100 patients completed the survey (median age—61 years; range 25–86, female—56%). Of the total 65% were rectal cancers while 35% were colon cancers. QOL assessment reported a PCS of 0.64 and a MCS of 0.67 (Max- 1.0). There was no difference in QOL between rectal and colon cancers (PCS: rectal—0.64 vs colon—0.63, P = 0.9; MCS: rectal— 0.65 vs colon—0.66) or based on follow-up period (\5 years vs[ 5 years; P = 0.3 and 0.9). Organ function related problems were reported by 69% and increased frequency was the main complaint (27%). CONCLUSION: The QOL of a Sri Lankan cohort of CRC survivors is described. QOL did not differ between rectal and colon cancers. Neither PCS nor MCS had significantly improved over time following surgery.