Browsing by Author "Wass, V."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Peer feedback for examiner quality assurance on MRCGP International South Asia: a mixed methods study
    (BioMed Central, 2017) Perera, D.P.; Andrades, M.; Wass, V.
    BACKGROUND: The International Membership Examination (MRCGP[INT]) of the Royal College of General Practitioners UK is a unique collaboration between four South Asian countries with diverse cultures, epidemiology, clinical facilities and resources. In this setting good quality assurance is imperative to achieve acceptable standards of inter rater reliability. This study aims to explore the process of peer feedback for examiner quality assurance with regard to factors affecting the implementation and acceptance of the method. METHODS: A sequential mixed methods approach was used based on focus group discussions with examiners (n = 12) and clinical examination convenors who acted as peer reviewers (n = 4). A questionnaire based on emerging themes and literature review was then completed by 20 examiners at the subsequent OSCE exam. Qualitative data were analysed using an iterative reflexive process. Quantitative data were integrated by interpretive analysis looking for convergence, complementarity or dissonance. The qualitative data helped understand the issues and informed the process of developing the questionnaire. The quantitative data allowed for further refining of issues, wider sampling of examiners and giving voice to different perspectives. RESULTS: Examiners stated specifically that peer feedback gave an opportunity for discussion, standardisation of judgments and improved discriminatory abilities. Interpersonal dynamics, hierarchy and perception of validity of feedback were major factors influencing acceptance of feedback. Examiners desired increased transparency, accountability and the opportunity for equal partnership within the process. The process was stressful for examiners and reviewers; however acceptance increased with increasing exposure to receiving feedback. The process could be refined to improve acceptability through scrupulous attention to training and selection of those giving feedback to improve the perceived validity of feedback and improved reviewer feedback skills to enable better interpersonal dynamics and a more equitable feedback process. It is important to highlight the role of quality assurance and peer feedback as a tool for continuous improvement and maintenance of standards to examiners during training. CONCLUSION: Examiner quality assurance using peer feedback was generally a successful and accepted process. The findings highlight areas for improvement and guide the path towards a model of feedback that is responsive to examiner views and cultural sensibilities.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Qualitative study of motivators and outcomes of Sri Lankan doctors achieving MRCGP International
    (Radcliffe Medical Press, 2013) Pettigrew, L.M.; Perera, D.P.; Wass, V.
    BACKGROUND: The UK's Royal College of General Practitioners accredits overseas examinations in family medicine through MRCGP[INT] rather than exporting MRCGP UK. There is limited research on the motivating factors and outcomes of this practice on candidates. AIM: To explore factors motivating Sri Lankan doctors to pursue the South Asian MRCGP[INT] and their perceived benefits and barriers to sitting the examination. METHODS: Qualitative semi-structured 1:1 interviews with 14 successful past MRCGP[INT]SA candidates were undertaken in Sri Lanka. Findings were analysed with N-Vivo software. A phenomenological approach was used. Interpretive dimensions were applied drawing on information from interviews, informal conversations and observations. RESULTS: Motivators to sit the examination included a desire to improve patient care and seeking recognition as a family doctor. Younger doctors had hopes of increased future income and there was some expectation that the examination may improve overseas employment prospects. The examination conferred greater confidence, new patient-centred communication skills, introduced the use of evidence-based guidelines and increased awareness of the UK health system to most participants. There were examples of diffusion of knowledge through different teaching channels. Relative to Sri Lankan examinations, formal training opportunities were limited and value for money of annual membership fees were questioned. Financial and geographical barriers to the examination were noted. CONCLUSION: Currently MRCGP[INT]SA offers additional value for successful candidates in Sri Lanka who perceive accreditation by a UK college favourably. Improvement of pre- and post-exam support linked to MRCGP[INT]SA in Sri Lanka is needed. Further research into the long-term impact is necessary, in particular regarding equity of access, migration and local training development.