Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of DSpace
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Strouhal, R."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for primary surgery in medically refectory ulcerative colitis: a case series
    (Wiely-Blackwell, 2016) Chandrasinghe, P.C.; Leo, C.A.; Samaranayake, S.F.; Santorelliei, C.; Strouhal, R.; Warusavitarne, J.
    INTRODUCTION: Medically refractive ulcerative colitis (UC) requires surgical intervention. Due to the ongoing inflammation in the colon this patient group is considered as high risk. Primary surgery includes subtotal colectomy (STC) as the first step of a staged restorative procedure, restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) or panproctocolectomy (PPC) with end ileostomy. Single incision surgery is gaining popularity in this group of patients. METHOD: Patients who underwent single incision surgery for medically refractory UC from 2013 January to 2015 December were prospectively followed up. Demographics, hospital stay and early complications were analyzed. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the medians. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients (male – 24, median age – 41.5 years; range 17–69 years) were included. There were 21 STCs, 9 PPCs and 4 RPCs done as primary surgery for medically refractory UC. The median hospital stay was 7 days (4–41 days). Four out of 34 patients had a complication with Clavien-Dindo score above 3; (2-re-operation for obstruction (5%), 2 required intensive care for sepsis (5%). Two procedures (5.8%) had to be converted strategically to open. Three patients had cancer in the resected specimen. The median age of those who had PPC was significantly higher compared to those who had restorative procedures (48 years: range 17–69 Vs 38 years: range 34–64; P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Single incision surgery for medically refractory UC is safe with an acceptable complication profile in this group of medically unwell patients. The quality of life implications of this procedure require further evaluation.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for primary surgery in medically refectory ulcerative colitis: a case series
    (Wiely-Blackwell, 2016) Chandrasinghe, P.C.; Leo, C.A.; Samaranayake, S.F.; Santorelli, C.; Strouhal, R.; Warusavitarne, J.
    AIM:Medically refractive ulcerative colitis (UC) requires surgical intervention. Primary surgery includes subtotal colectomy (STC), restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) or panproctocolectomy (PPC) with end ileostomy. Single incision surgery is gaining popularity in this group of patients. METHOD: Patients who underwent single incision surgery for medically refractory UC from 2013 January to 2015 December were prospectively followed up. Demographics, hospital stay and early complications were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were included. There were 21 STCs, 9 PPCs and 4 RPCs done as primary surgery for medically refractory UC. The median hospital stay was 7 days (range: 4–41 days). Four out of 34 patients had a complication with Clavien-Dindo score above 3; (2-re-operation for obstruction (5%), 2 required intensive care for sepsis (5%). Two procedures (5.8%) had to be converted strategically to open. Three patients had cancer in the resected specimen. The median age of those who had PPC was significantly higher compared to those who had restorative procedures (48 years: range 17–69 vs 38 years: range 34–64; P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Single incision surgery for medically refractory UC is safe with an acceptable complication profile. The quality of life implications of this procedure require further evaluation.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): review of technique and initial experience
    (College of Surgeons of Sri Lanka, 2017) Chandrasinghe, P.; Strouhal, R.; Srinivasaiah, N.; Alex Leo, C.; Samaranayake, S.; Warusavitarne, J.
    INTRODUCTION: Trans anal minimal invasive surgery (TAMIS) is a novel technique gaining popularity in colorectal surgery due to its precision in pelvic dissection and easy accessibility to the distal rectum. Its use in colorectal cancer surgery is well documented although inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) poses a unique set of disease-specific and procedure-related challenges. Unlike in cancer surgery, the wide disease spectrum with varying morphological changes in IBD would require the surgeon to adapt accordingly from port insertion to wound closure. This article describes our experience with the first 60 procedures. METHODOLOGY: Patients affected by IBD requiring proctectomy with or without total colectomy from 2013 to 2016 were offered Trans anal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) on a TAMIS and Single Incision Laparoscopy (SILS) combined platform. Airseal ® insufflation on GelpointPath ® platform with monopolar diathermy was used for rectal surgery. A second team using ultrasonic dissection carried out concomitant abdominal dissection. Procedural modifications were adopted based on authors' personal experience. Standard ileoanal S pouch with stapler anastomosis was performed. Surgical time, blood loss and patient demographics were recorded. RESULTS: All 60 patients (male – 44; median age 42.5; range 19-75) presented during the study period underwent TaTME for the rectal dissection with an 8% conversion rate. Of the total 38 (63%) were done for ulcerative colitis and the perineal phase has taken a median time of 141.8 minutes. Ileo-anal pouch surgery was performed in 27 (45%) patients. Two patients (3.3%) required re-intervention due to complications in the abdominal procedure. Two patients required vacuum dressing for wound closure. CONCLUSION: TaTME is a safe and feasible procedure in IBD surgery. Specific difficulties due to the inflammatory process which results in difficult dissection can be overcome with attention to anatomical details and the use of specific instruments.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify