Browsing by Author "Ranasinghe, L.N."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Communication with communities: importance of listening and talking to people affected by disaster
    (4th International Conference on Social Sciences 2018, Research Centre for Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, 2018) Ranasinghe, L.N.
    Under a systematic desk study, the paper reviews how community engagement has developed during the recent past and identifies reasons for which communication with communities has become indispensable in humanitarian action. Beyond the conceptual problem that NGOs hold almost all the power, major practical obstacles have been identified during the desk study. These obstacles can be summed up: too often, international humanitarian agencies act independently, with a focus on supplying a limited range of goods and services that they have already prepared; On the ground, operating practices are dominated by a ‘contract culture’ of winning and delivering grants. This limits the voice of affected people in decision-making. Statistics on community consultations for the World Humanitarian Summit states that 3/4 Syrians in Jordan report never being asked whether they have received the help which they needed. 1/2 conflict-affected Ukrainians have not received the assistance they needed because they were not aware of its availability. 9/10 of Syrians in Jordan have received assistance, but only 3/10 have found that assistance was helpful. Engaging with and being accountable to people affected by disaster and crisis is not a new proposition. According to the findings, it is rather stemmed in the participatory methods that emerged in the 1980s, and that were formalized as engagement and participation through system-wide initiatives such as Sphere, the Humanitarian Accountability Partnership (HAP), People in Aid, the Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action (ALNAP) and, most recently, the Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS) on Quality and Accountability. The main finding of this ongoing desk study is that beyond oneway information provision and consultation, meaningful engagement is achieved when humanitarians ensure that public concerns are consistently understood, considered and addressed through ongoing dialogue or two-way communication
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Digitalization of Community Engagement Practices and Research in Humanitarian Action
    (International Postgraduate Research Conference 2019, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, 2019) Ranasinghe, L.N.
    Under a systematic desk study and insider interviews, the paper reviews how community engagement practices and research in humanitarian action has been digitalized during the recent past. It also identifies reasons for which communication with communities has become indispensable in humanitarian action. Engaging with and being accountable to people affected by disaster and crisis is not a new proposition. It stems from the participatory methods that emerged in the 1980s. These methods were formalized as engagement and participation through system-wide initiatives and humanitarian research such as Sphere, the Humanitarian Accountability Partnership (HAP), People in Aid, the Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action (ALNAP) and, most recently, the Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS) on Quality and Accountability. The main finding of this ongoing research is that, beyond one-way information provision, meaningful engagement is achieved when humanitarian organizations ensure that public concerns are consistently understood, considered and addressed. This can be done through ongoing dialogue or two-way communication using the latest technological advances. Most of the humanitarian actors have now turned into digital information gathering, curates and analyses volunteered geographic information (VGI) on urban communities. This transformation is based on a combination of collaborative satellite-imagery digitization and participatory mapping, which relies upon geospatial open-source technologies and the collaborative mapping platform OpenStreetMap, mobile phones usage for digital data collection using open data kit, online cash transfers, and social media to biometrics identification, geospatial mapping, drones, and big data. The desk study and the conducted insider interviews with humanitarian aid workers conclude that these new technological advancements address the twofold challenge of achieving equitable community engagement. In the meantime, they generate spatial data that adheres quality standards to produce rigorous and trusted evidence for policy and decision making.