Browsing by Author "Leo, A."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Improving quality of life after pouch surgery with a dedicated nurse led follow up programme
    (Wiely-Blackwell, 2016) Chandrasinghe, P.; Leo, A.; Alison, L.; Perry-Woodford, Z.; Warusavitarne, J.
    AIM:Bowel function after ileal pouch affects the quality of life (QOL). The aim of the study was to assess if objective evaluation and specialised supportive care improves QOL after pouch surgery.METHOD: Consecutive patients who had an ileoanal pouch were invited to participate in a systematic follow-up regime led by specialised pouch nurse practitioners. The Cleveland global Quality of Life (CGQOL) and specific pouch related symptoms were documented at 6, 12, 24 and 52 weeks after ileostomy reversal. Pearson's Rho coefficient was used to assess the correlation between symptoms and CGQOL. RESULTS: Thirty-nine consecutive patients who had ileoanal pouch surgery were evaluated. Thirty-four had more than two visits and improvement in CGQOL (mean-1.36 ± 0.95) was seen in 27 (79%). There was reduction in CGQOL in 5 patients (15%) and no change in 2 (6%). Daytime frequency (DTF) significantly correlated with mean CGQOL (R = −0.7, P < 0.01). Twenty (59%) of 34 had reduced DTF after intervention. Nocturnal frequency only showed correlation with CGQOL up to 3 months. Incontinence had no impact on the QOL in this cohort. CONCLUSION: DTF has the highest impact on QOL in this cohort. Regular systematic specialised pouch care follow up may achieve better QOL.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) as surgical option in Crohn’s disease: our experience
    (Wiely-Blackwell, 2016) Leo, A.; Samaranayake, S.F.; Hodgkinson, J.D.; Santorelli, C.; Chandrasinghe, P.C.; Warusavitarne, J.H.
    AIM: Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) is a newer mini-invasive. Benefits of SILS in complex Crohn’s disease (CCD), which includes a significant cohort of young patients sometimes needing multiple operations has not been comprehensively assessed. This study analyses our early experience. METHOD: Data were collected prospectively from January 2013 to December 2015. Ileocolic resections, right hemicolectomy, small bowel stricturoplasties and resections SILS were included in the CCD cohort. Primary and re-do surgeries were analysed separately. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were included: 39 ileocolic resections, 6 small bowel stricturoplasty/resections. Median hospital stay was 8 days (Range - 3 days – 28 days). Three patients from primary (11%) and 2 from re-do group (11%) had to be converted to open surgery. Total complication rate was 35.5% including 31.1% ClavienDindo 1 and 2. In term of operating time, average blood loss, conversion rates, complication rate and hospital stay, there was no significant difference between the groups. Six months follow-up showed no major complications. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated the feasibility of SILS in patients with CCD. There were no significant differences between primary and re-do surgeries. More robust data and longer follow-up is needed in future studies to evaluate this further.