Browsing by Author "Jayasinghe, L.R."

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7

Domain-Specific learning among medical students
(Basic Medical Scientists Association, 2012) Perera, D.; Ramanayake, R.P.J.C.; de Silva, A.H.W.; Sumanasekara, R.D.N.; Jayasinghe, L.R.; Gunasekara, R.; Chandrasiri, P.
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate undergraduate medical student’s domain-specific learning. Method: The research tool was a structured essay question formulated to assess factual and affective knowledge and application and synthesis of knowledge .The question was administered to 151 students. Results: Mean score on the recall question was significantly higher than the other two domains. Total scores of female students were significantly higher than male students (P<0.05). Gender-wise difference in scores was not significant in any specific domain area. There was no significant relationship between factual knowledge and total scores. However, there was a significant linear relationship between total scores and the two areas of affective knowledge (r=0.78) and application and synthesis of knowledge (r=0.6). Findings indicate that affective knowledge and application of knowledge are closely related to overall acquisition of knowledge (P<0.0005). Conclusion: Teaching and assessment in higher-order knowledge domains and affective knowledge needs to be developed. Questions dealing with affective knowledge and testing higher-order cognitive abilities are more discriminatory than questions testing at the recall level.
Knowledge of location of organs in the body among patients attending a university family practice in Sri Lanka
(2013) Ramanayake, J.; Perera, D.; de Silva, A.; Sumanasekera, D.; Jayasinghe, L.R.; Gunasekera, R.; Chandrasiri, P.
Introduction: The referral letter is the interface between the primary and secondary/tertiary levels of care. It facilitates the referral process and is beneficial for optimizing patient care. In Sri Lanka a referral letter is not essential to consult a Specialist. In this scenario, the quality as well as the number of referral letters encountered in practice needed to be explored. Objectives: To describe Specialists' views on the quality of referral letters received, perceived advantages of referral letters and to identify other modes of communication between General Practitioners and Specialists. Methods: Conducted in 2013, this study consisted of in-depth interviews using a semi-structured format, with 21 purposively selected Specialists representing a range of specialties. They included clinicians and university academics from both the government and the private sector. Analysis was by generating a thematic framework based on the recurrent themes and issues which was then applied to the textual data. Results: Most patients consulted Specialists without a referral letter and also the few letters received were of poor clarity, lacking important information and scribbled in illegible hand. Main themes identified as advantages of referral letters were: impart important information about the patient, clear description of the initial condition and treatment given, reduced consultation time, prevents delays in diagnosis and reduced healthcare costs by reducing polypharmacy and repetition of investigations. Some of the other modes of communication suggested by Specialists were via telephone, SMS, fax and email. Conclusions: The general belief amongst Specialists is that referral letters are an important part of the patient care system. This has not been adequately utilized by the primary care providers in Sri Lanka, despite the numerous advantages described. Also consideration needs to be given to newer modes of emerging information communication technology
Rate of stunting among a sample of postwar resettled families in the Vanni region: a study from the Mullativu District
(Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2013) Ramanayake, R.P.J.C.; Sumanasekera, R.D.N.; de Silva, A.H.W.; Perera, D.P.; Chandrasiri, P.; Gunasekera, R.; Jayasinghe, L.R.
The Department of Family Medicine, University of Kelaniya conducted a health camp in Puthukudiyiruppu in March 2011. Height and weight measurements were carried out and data of 303 participants were analysed. The rate of stunting among children below six years in this population was 62% compared to 19.3% nationally. Thirty four percent of children and adolescents (6-18yrs) were underweight and 21.4% of adults had a BMI less than 18.5kg/m2.
Referral letter with an attached structured reply form: Is it a solution for not getting replies
(Mumbai : Medknow, 2013) Ramanayake, R.P.J.C.; Perera, D.P.; de Silva, A.H.W.; Sumanasekera, R.D.N.; Jayasinghe, L.R.; Fernando, K.A.T.; Athukorala, L.A.C.L.
Background: Communication between primary care doctors and specialists/hospital doctors is vital for smooth functioning of a health care system. In many instances referral and reply letters are the sole means of communication between general practitioners and hospital doctors/specialists. Despite the obvious benefits to patient care, answers to referral letters are the exception worldwide. In Sri Lanka hand written conventional letters are used to refer patients and replies are scarce. Materials and Methods: This interventional study was designed to assess if attaching a structured reply form with the referral letter would increase the rate of replies/back-referrals. It was conducted at the Family Medicine Clinic of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya. A structured referral letter (form) was designed based on guide lines and literature and it was used for referral of patients for a period of six months. Similarly a structured reply form was also designed and both the referral letter and the reply letter were printed on A4 papers side by side and these were used for the next six months for referrals. Both letters had headings and space underneath to write details pertaining to the patient. A register was maintained to document the number of referrals and replies received during both phases. Patents were asked to return the reply letters if specialists/hospital doctors obliged to reply. Results: Total of 90 patients were referred using the structured referral form during 1st phase. 80 letters (with reply form attached) were issued during the next six months. Patients were referred to eight different specialties. Not a single reply during the 1 st phase and there were six 6 (7.5%) replies during the 2 nd phase. Discussion: This was an attempt to improve communication between specialists/hospital doctors and primary care doctors. Even though there was some improvement it was not satisfactory. A multicenter island wide study should be conducted to assess the acceptability of the format to primary care doctors and specialists and its impact on reply rate
Referral letters from general practitioners to hospitals in Sri Lanka; lack information and clarity
(mediWORLD International, 2013) Ramanayake, R. P. J. C.; Perera, D.P.; de Silva, A.H.W.; Sumanasekera, R. D. N.; Jayasinghe, L.R.; Fernando, K. A. T.; Athukorala, L. A. C. L.
BACKGROUND: Referral of patients to hospitals, specialists and other institutions is an essential part of primary health care. In many instances the referral letter is the sole means of communication between general practitioners (GPs) and specialists/hospital doctors. This study was planned to assess the quality of referral letters sent by general practitioners to out patient departments (OPD) of hospitals. METHODOLOGY: This descriptive cross sectional study was conducted in four hospitals of different levels of care provision in Sri Lanka. Referral letters received by the OPDs during a period of 2 weeks were analyzed. A check list to extract data was developed based on the items of information expected in a referral letter and legibility. Each item was assigned a score. This scoring system was validated using a panel of experts by means of Delphi method. Maximum score possible for a letter was 30. RESULTS: A total of 461 letters were analyzed. Items of information most often present were; to whom referred (96.7%), symptoms (91.5%), reason for referral (90.2%) and date (88.9%). The least often present items were; family history (0.2%), history of allergy (1.1%) and social history (1.7%). Most of the words were not legible in 42.3% of the letters. Median score of the sample was 16 (mean=15.69) Mean score of structured form letters was 18.61 (n=33) and in conventional letters it was 15.53 (n=428). The observed difference was statistically significant (z=-3.544, p<0.01). DISCUSSION: Most of the letters did not have the required information and legibility was also poor. Expected benefits of a referral letter to the patient, recipient and the referring doctor will not be achieved due to these short comings. Form letters were comparatively better. Measures should be taken to improve the content and clarity of referral letters.
Views of specialists on referral communications - a qualitative study from Sri Lanka
(mediWORLD International, 2014) Ramanayake, R.P.J.C.; Perera, D.P.; de Silva, A.H.W.; Sumanasekera, R.D.N.; Jayasinghe, L.R.; Fernando, K.A.T.; Athukorala, L.A.C.L.
INTRODUCTION: The referral letter is the interface between the primary and secondary/tertiary levels of care. It facilitates the referral process and is beneficial for optimizing patient care. In Sri Lanka a referral letter is not essential to consult a Specialist. In this scenario, the quality as well as the number of referral letters encountered in practice needed to be explored. OBJECTIVES: To describe Specialists’ views on the quality of referral letters received, perceived advantages of referral letters and to identify other modes of communication between General Practitioners and Specialists. METHODS: Conducted in 2013, this study consisted of in-depth interviews using a semi-structured format, with 21 purposively selected Specialists representing a range of specialties. They included clinicians and university academics from both the government and the private sector. Analysis was by generating a thematic framework based on the recurrent themes and issues which was then applied to the textual data. RESULTS: Most patients consulted Specialists without a referral letter and also the few letters received were of poor clarity, lacking important information and scribbled in illegible hand. Main themes identified as advantages of referral letters were: impart important information about the patient, clear description of the initial condition and treatment given, reduced consultation time, prevents delays in diagnosis and reduced healthcare costs by reducing polypharmacy and repetition of investigations. Some of the other modes of communication suggested by Specialists were via telephone, SMS, fax and email. CONCLUSIONS: The general belief amongst Specialists is that referral letters are an important part of the patient care system. This has not been adequately utilized by the primary care providers in Sri Lanka, despite the numerous advantages described. Also consideration needs to be given to newer modes of emerging information communication technology.
Why are specialists reluctant to reply to referral letters-exploring the views of specialists in Sri Lanka
(Lahore Institute of Public Health(liphealth), 2014) Ramanayake, R.P.J.C.; Perera, D.P.; de Silva, A.H.W.; Sumanasekera, R.D.N.; Fernando, K.A.T.; Jayasinghe, L.R.; Athukorala, L.A.C.L.
BACKGROUND: The referral letter from General Practitioner and the reply from the Specialist is the interface between the primary and secondary/tertiary levels of care. It facilitates the referral process and is beneficial for optimizing patient care. In Sri Lanka there is no established referral/back referral system. Not receiving a response to their referrals is a common grievance made by most primary care doctors. In this scenario, the views of Specialists were explored on the importance of reply letters and measures to improve communication. METHOD: Conducted in 2013, this study consisted of in-depth interviews using a semi-structured format, with 21 purposively selected Specialists representing a range of specialties. They included clinicians and university academics from both the government and the private sector. Specialists rarely contacting a GP, such as anesthesiologists and microbiologists, were not invited to participate. Analysis was by generating a thematic framework based on the recurrent themes and issues which was then applied to the textual data. RESULTS: Most Specialists identify that it is important to reply to referrals. These reply letters provide the Primary care doctors with a further management plan, enhance continuity of care and is a source of education to the General Practitioner. Despite the above benefits, the practice of writing a reply is dependent on the following factors: time constraints, lack of clerical assistance, known General Practitioner, patient’s condition and the quality of the referral letter. As methods of improving communication between primary and secondary care it was suggested that referrals be made mandatory to be seen by a Specialist, improving informal communication between Specialists and GPs via regional clinical meetings and introducing a structured referral letter with an attached reply form. CONCLUSIONS: Specialists acknowledge the importance of reply letters in the referral process. Further steps need to be taken to improve the reply rates. This includes changes that need to occur in the referring General Practitioners, Specialists and the practicing institutions creating an environment that is conducive to the referral process.