Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of DSpace
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Gunasekara, P.C."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Altered pelvic floor physiology in women with uterovaginal prolapse (UVP)
    (Sri Lanka Medical Association, 1997) Deen, K.I.; Gunasekara, P.C.
    INTRODUCTION: Although an association between Uterovaginal prolapse (UVP) and urinary incontinence is known, the prevalence of anoreetal dysfunction in UVP remains largely unexplored. AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of u re ih roves Seal and anorectal dysfunction in UVP. METHODS: 27 women (median age - 52 years, range 31 - 68 years) with UVP were evaluated by functional and anoreetal physiologic assessment. Data were compared with 20 age matched controls without UVP. Urethrovesical fimcfion was assessed by a 5 point functional score (micturitition frequency, nociuria, urgency, stress incontinence and residual sensation of urine), where 0- no dysfunction, 1,2-minimal, 3,4 - moderate and 5 implied severe dysfunction. Anoredal function was evaluated by clinical assessment and anoreetal physiology. Anal canal pressures were measured by microballoon manomelry. RESULTS : Moderate to severe urethrovesical dysfunction was seen in 33% of patients compared with none of (lie control group (P = 0.052, test of proportions). Anorectal mucosal prolapse was seen in 63% of patients compared with 13% of controls (p = 0.045, test of proportions). Maximum resting (MRP) and squeeze anal pressures (MSP) did not differ significantly between patients and controls. MRP [median, (range)] - Patients; 51 mm Hg (20 - 87) vs. Controls; 60mm 1 Ig (25 - 80), P>0.05; MSP [median, (range)] - Patients; 82 mm Hg (39 - 165) vs. Controls; 100mm Ilg (60 - 185, p>0.05, Wiieoxon test. However, the length of Hie high pressure zone (I IPZ) was significantly less in patients compared with controls (111*2 I cm - Patients = 56% vs. IIPZ 1cm - Controls = 10%, P=0.038, test of proportions). Abnormal anal electroscnsilivity (> 14 inAmps) was seen in 52% of patients compared with none in the control group (P=0.024) and abnormal vaginal electrosensation (> 12mAmps) in 55% of patients vs. 10% Of controls (P = 0.031), test of proportions. CONCLUSION: A greater proportion of women with UVP exhibited either urethrovcssical or anoreetal dysfunction or both compared with controls indicating a pan-pelvic floor weakness. Theses abnormalities should be considered in overall management of women with UVP
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Should Sri Lanka reconsider its rubella immunisation strategy?
    (Ceylon Medical Association, 1997) Gunasekara, P.C.; Gunasekara, D.P.
    No abstract available

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify