Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/24342
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSiriwardana, R.C.
dc.contributor.authorKumarage, S.K.
dc.contributor.authorGunetilleke, M.B.
dc.contributor.authorThilakarathne, S.B.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-14T11:54:51Z
dc.date.available2022-01-14T11:54:51Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationHPB. 2018; 20 (S2):S720en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-182X
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/24342
dc.descriptionE Poster Abstract(EP03C-026), 13th World Congress of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, 4-7 September 2018, Geneva, Switzerlanden_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Transverse abdominal plane block (TAP) is a new technique of regional block described to reduce postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Recent reports describe an easy technique to deliver local anesthetic agent under laparoscopic guidance. METHODS: This randomized control trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of additional laparoscopic guided TAP block against the standard full thickness port site infiltration. 45 patients were randomized in to each arm after excluding emergency LC, conversions, ones with coagulopathy, pregnancy and allergy to local anesthetics. All cases were four ports LC. Interventions - Both groups received standard port site infiltration with 3-5ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. The test group received additional laparoscopic guided TAP block with 20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine subcostaly, between the anterior axillary and mid clavicular lines. As outcome measures the pain score, opioid requirement, episodes of nausea and vomiting and time to mobilize was measured at 6 hourly intervals. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable in the age, gender, body mass index, indication for cholecystectomy difficulty index and surgery duration. The pain score at six hours (P = 0.043) and opioid requirement at six hours (P =0.026) was higher in the TAP group. These were similar in subsequent assessments. Other secondary outcomes were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-guided transverses abdominis plane block does not give an additional pain relief or other favorable outcomes. It can worsen the pain scoresen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectCholecystectomy, Laparoscopicen_US
dc.subjectPain, Postoperative -prevention & controlen_US
dc.titleLocal infiltration versus Laparoscopic e guided transverse abdominis plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy e double blinded randomized control trialen_US
dc.typeConference Abstracten_US
dc.creator.corporateauthorInternational Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association(IHPBA)en
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
HPB.2018.06.1451 Abstract.pdf39.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.