Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1839
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChisholm, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGureje, O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSaldivia, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVillalon Calderon, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWickremasinghe, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMendis, N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAyuso-Mateos, J. L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSaxena, S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-29T09:26:48Z-
dc.date.available2014-10-29T09:26:48Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.citationBulletin of the World Health Organization. 2008; 86(7): pp.542-51en_US
dc.identifier.issn0042-9686 (Print)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1564-0604 (Electronic)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1839-
dc.descriptionIndexed in MEDLINE-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Schizophrenia is a highly disabling disease and is costly to treat. We set out to establish what are the most cost-effective interventions applicable to developing regions and countries. METHODS: Analysis was undertaken at the level of three WHO subregions spanning the Americas, Africa and South-East Asia, and subsequently in three member states (Chile, Nigeria and Sri Lanka). A state transition model was used to estimate the population-level health impact of older and newer antipsychotic drugs, alone or in combination with psychosocial intervention. Total population-level costs (in international dollars or local currencies) and effectiveness (measured in disability-adjusted life years averted) were combined to form cost-effectiveness ratios. FINDINGS: The most cost-effective interventions were those using older antipsychotic drugs combined with psychosocial treatment, delivered via a community-based service model (I$ 2350-7158 per disability-adjusted life year averted across the three subregions, I$ 1670-3400 following country-level contextualisation within each of these subregions). The relative cost-effectiveness of interventions making use of newer, "atypical" antipsychotic drugs is estimated to be much less favourable. CONCLUSION: By moving to a community-based service model and selecting efficient treatment options, the cost of substantially increasingtreatment coverage is not high (less than I$ 1 investment per capita). Taken together with other priority-setting criteria such as disease severity, vulnerability and human rights protection, this study suggests that a great deal more could be done for persons and families living under the spectre of this disorder-
dc.publisherWorld Health Organizationen_US
dc.titleSchizophrenia treatment in the developing world: an interregional and multinational cost-effectiveness analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.departmentPublic Healthen_US
dc.creator.corporateauthorWorld Health Organizationen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.