Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/14673
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSmol’kin, A.A.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-21T04:42:19Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-21T04:42:19Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationSmol’kin, A.A. 2016. Intergenerational interaction in public transport. 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences (3rd ICSS), 30th September - 01st October 2016, Research Centre for Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. p 59.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/14673-
dc.description.abstractThis work is supposed to study the phenomenon “to (not) cede a seat” to elderly people in public transport (usually “to cede a seat” is understood as “manifestation of respect” by participants of a situation, and is estimated from daily prospect in this context). The research is based on interviews and materials of the participant observation of passengers behavior in public transport in 2009-2015 in Moscow and Saratov. Theoretical basis is Gofman's researches on Face-Work. Any person, who suddenly feels unhealthy and demonstrates it to others, will be likely to be given a seat unconditionally. Nevertheless, a 60 years old person looking strong and conscious, without any physical troubles (even if he or she might be retired) would be hardly invited to take a seat. The logic to concede a place is based not as much on the principle of the “respect for age(ing)”, but more on the “compassion for the ailing elderly”. Most part of conflict situations is based on different understanding of legitimate reasons for conceding a place – the vigorous behavior of an elderly person might not be compatible with a behavior scheme to which he or she intentionally refers. The conceding a place to the elderly person is a rule conditioned by the observer’s context. On one hand, “conceding a place” is still a socially expected norm, on the other, the rule is regularly broken. There are two main strategies “not to concede a place”: “I see but I can not” - a strategy of an “urgent business” when a person pretends being “occupied with something important”. This strategy can be divided into a short-term (“to play for time”) and a long-term (“to expose the impossibility”) options. “Inattention” strategy - I “do not see”, that theoretically does not allow to consider that the sitting person refuses to show respect as he or she is not “really included” in a situation. With regard to this strategy, we can mention: “looking out of the window”, “falling asleep”, “listening to music” and various options of manipulation with the cell phone. In practice most ways to avoid conceding a place combines both options in different proportions.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherResearch Centre for Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.subjectelderly peopleen_US
dc.subjectrespecten_US
dc.subjectbehavior in public placesen_US
dc.subjectpublic transporten_US
dc.subjectintergeneration relationshipen_US
dc.subjectrule of breaking rulesen_US
dc.titleIntergenerational interaction in public transporten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:ICSS 2016

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
59.pdf814.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.