| dc.contributor.author |
Manamperi, N.H. |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.author |
de Silva, M.V.C. |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.author |
Pathirana, N. |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.author |
Abeyewickreme, W. |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.author |
Karunaweera, N.D. |
en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2018-02-02T08:23:24Z |
en_US |
| dc.date.available |
2018-02-02T08:23:24Z |
en_US |
| dc.date.issued |
2018 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation |
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.2018; 98(3):759-762 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn |
0002-9637 (Print) |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn |
1476-1645 (Electronic) |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn |
0002-9637 (Linking) |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/18594 |
en_US |
| dc.description |
Indexed In MEDLINE |
en_US |
| dc.description.abstract |
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is diagnosed mainly by light microscopy of smears made using lesion material. Histopathology is usually done in atypical presentations or when lesion smears are negative. Tissue impression smears (TIS) made from skin biopsy specimens were compared with histopathology for the diagnosis of CL. Out of the 111 patients included, 83 (74.8%) were positive by either methods. The TIS was positive in 70.3% whereas histopathology was positive in 56.8% of patients. Tissue impression smears can be used as a supplementary diagnostic test that gives sensitive and rapid results when tissue biopsies are used as the source of lesion material for diagnosis of CL. |
en_US |
| dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
| dc.publisher |
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Cutaneous leishmaniasis |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Tissue impression smears as a supplementary diagnostic method for histopathology in cutaneous leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Article |
en_US |