Browsing by Author "Chen, C.L."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Baseline characteristics and treatment response of patients from the Philippines in the CHIMES study
    (Wiley-Blackwell, 2014) Navarro, J.C.; Gan, H.H.; Lao, A.Y.; Baroque, A.C.; Hiyadan, J.H.; Chua, C.L.; San Jose, M.C.; Advincula, J.M.; Lee, C.F.; Bousser, M.G.; Chen, C.L.; CHIMES Study Investigators (38); de Silva, H.A. CHIMES Study Investigator; Ranawaka, U. CHIMES Study Investigator; Wijekoon, N. CHIMES Study Investigator
    BACKGROUND: The CHIMES Study compared MLC601 with placebo in patients with ischemic stroke of intermediate severity in the preceding 72 h. Sites from the Philippines randomized 504 of 1099 (46%) patients in the study. We aimed to define the patient characteristics and treatment responses in this subgroup to better plan future trials. METHODS: The CHIMES dataset was used to compare the baseline characteristics, time from stroke onset to study treatment initiation, and treatment responses to MLC601 between patients recruited from Philippines and the rest of the cohort. Treatment effect was analyzed using end-points at month 3 as described in the primary publication, that is, modified Rankin Score, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and Barthel Index. RESULTS: The Philippine cohort was younger, had more women, worse baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and longer time delay from stroke onset to study treatment compared with the rest of the cohort. Age (P = 0•003), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (P < 0•001), and stroke onset to study treatment initiation (P  = 0•016) were predictors of modified Rankin Score at three-months. Primary analysis of modified Rankin Score shift was in favor of MLC601 (adjusted odds ratio 1•41, 95% confidence interval 1•01–1•96). Secondary analyses were likewise in favor of MLC601 for modified Rankin Score dichotomy 0–1, improvement in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (total and motor scores), and Barthel Index. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment effects in the Philippine cohort were in favor of MLC601. This may be due to inclusion of more patients with predictors of poorer outcome.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    CHIMES-I: sub-group analyzes of the effects of NeuroAiD according to baseline brain imaging characteristics among patients randomized in the CHIMES study
    (Sage Publications, 2013) Navarro, J.C.; Chen, C.L.; Lagamayo, P.D.; Geslani, M.B.; Eow, G.B.; Poungvarin, N.; de Silva, A.; Wong, L.K.; Venketasubramanian, N.; CHIMES Investigators
    RATIONALE: The clinical effects of neuroprotective and/or neurorestorative therapies may vary according to location and size of the ischemic injury. Imaging techniques can be useful in stratifying patients for trials that may be beneficial against particular ischemic lesion characteristics. AIM: To test the hypothesis that the efficacy of NeuroAiD compared with placebo in improving functional outcome and reducing neurological deficit in patients with cerebral infarction of intermediate severity varies between sub-groups of patients randomized in the main Chinese Medicine Neuroaid Efficacy on Stroke study when categorized according to baseline imaging characteristics. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort sub-group analysis of patients who participated in the main Chinese Medicine Neuroaid Efficacy on Stroke study, a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that recruited 1100 patients within 72 h of ischemic stroke onset with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 6-14 and were randomized to either NeuroAiD or placebo taken four capsules three times daily for three months. Review of the baseline images to classify the acute stroke lesions in terms of size, location, and extent of involvement will be performed retrospectively by two readers who will remain blinded as to treatment allocation and outcomes of the subjects. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary efficacy end-point in the main Chinese Medicine Neuroaid Efficacy on Stroke study is the modified Rankin Scale grades at three-months. Secondary efficacy end-points are the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at three-months; difference of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores between baseline and 10 days and between baseline and three-months; difference of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale sub-scores between baseline and 10 days and between baseline and three-months; modified Rankin Scale at 10 days, one-month, and three-months; Barthel index at three-months; and Mini Mental State Examination at 10 days and three-months. Analysis of these primary and secondary end-points will be performed for sub-groups defined in this study after review of the baseline brain imaging: nonlacunar and lacunar, cortical and sub-cortical, hemispheric vs. brainstem, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score <7 and 7-10, and score <8 and 8-10.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Chinese medicine NeuroAiD efficacy on stroke recovery - extension study (CHIMES-E): A multicenter study of long-term efficacy
    (Karger Publisher, 2015) Venketasubramanian, N.; Young, S.H.; Tay, S.S.; Umapathi, T.; Lao, A.Y.; Gan, H.H.; Baroque II, A.C.; Navarro, J.C.; Chang, H.M.; Advincula, J.M.; Muengtaweepongsa, S.; Chan, B.P.; Chua, C.L.; Wijekoon, N.; de Silva, H.A.; Hiyadan, J.H.; Suwanwela, N.C.; Wong, K.S.; Poungvarin, N.; Eow, G.B.; Lee, C.F.; Chen, C.L.
    BACKGROUND: The CHInese Medicine NeuroAiD Efficacy on Stroke recovery (CHIMES) study was an international randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of MLC601 (NeuroAiD) in subjects with cerebral infarction of intermediate severity within 72 h. CHIMES-E (Extension) aimed at evaluating the effects of the initial 3-month treatment with MLC601 on long-term outcome for up to 2 years. METHODS: All subjects randomized in CHIMES were eligible for CHIMES-E. Inclusion criteria for CHIMES were age ≥18, baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale of 6-14, and pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤1. Initial CHIMES treatment allocation blinding was maintained, although no further study treatment was provided in CHIMES-E. Subjects received standard care and rehabilitation as prescribed by the treating physician. mRS, Barthel Index (BI), and occurrence of medical events were ascertained at months 6, 12, 18, and 24. The primary outcome was mRS at 24 months. Secondary outcomes were mRS and BI at other time points. RESULTS: CHIMES-E included 880 subjects (mean age 61.8 ± 11.3; 36% women). Adjusted OR for mRS ordinal analysis was 1.08 (95% CI 0.85-1.37, p = 0.543) and mRS dichotomy ≤1 was 1.29 (95% CI 0.96-1.74, p = 0.093) at 24 months. However, the treatment effect was significantly in favor of MLC601 for mRS dichotomy ≤1 at 6 months (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.11-2.01, p = 0.008), 12 months (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.05-1.90, p = 0.023), and 18 months (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01-1.83, p = 0.045), and for BI dichotomy ≥95 at 6 months (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.14-2.10, p = 0.005) but not at other time points. Subgroup analyses showed no treatment heterogeneity. Rates of death and occurrence of vascular and other medical events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: While the benefits of a 3-month treatment with MLC601 did not reach statistical significance for the primary endpoint at 2 years, the odds of functional independence defined as mRS ≤1 was significantly increased at 6 months and persisted up to 18 months after a stroke. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Chinese medicine neuroaid efficacy on stroke recovery: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study
    (Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2013) Chen, C.L.; Young, S.H.; Gan, H.H.; Singh, R.; Lao, A.Y.; Baroque, A.C.; Chang, H.M.; Hiyadan, J.H.; Chua, C.L.; Advincula, J.M.; Muengtaweepongsa, S.; Chan, B.P.; de Silva, H.A.; Towanabut, S.; Suwanwela, N.C.; Poungvarin, N.; Chankrachang, S.; Wong, K.S.; Eow, G.B.; Navarro, J.C.; Venketasubramanian, N.; Lee, C.F.; Bousser, M.G.; CHIMES Study Investigators
    BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous clinical studies suggested benefit for post stroke recovery when MLC601 was administered between 2 weeks and 6 months of stroke onset. The Chinese Medicine Neuroaid Efficacy on Stroke recovery (CHIMES) study tested the hypothesis that MLC601 is superior to placebo in acute, moderately severe ischemic stroke within a 72-hour time window. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized 1100 patients with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 6 to 14, within 72 hours of onset, to trial medications for 3 months. The primary outcome was a shift in the modified Rankin Scale. Secondary outcomes were modified Rankin Scale dichotomy, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale improvement, difference in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale total and motor scores, Barthel index, and mini-mental state examination. Planned subgroup analyses were performed according to age, sex, time to first dose, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, presence of cortical signs, and antiplatelet use. RESULTS: The modified Rankin Scale shift analysis-adjusted odds ratio was 1.09 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.32). Statistical difference was not detected between the treatment groups for any of the secondary outcomes. Subgroup analyses showed no statistical heterogeneity for the primary outcome; however, a trend toward benefit in the subgroup receiving treatment beyond 48 hours from stroke onset was noted. Serious and nonserious adverse events rates were similar between the 2 groups.CONCLUSIONS:MLC601 is statistically no better than placebo in improving outcomes at 3 months when used among patients with acute ischemic stroke of intermediate severity. Longer treatment duration and follow-up of participants with treatment initiated after 48 hours may be considered in future studies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00554723.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Effects of MLC601 on early vascular events in patients after stroke: the CHIMES study
    (Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2013) Chen, C.L.; Venketasubramanian, N.; Lee, C.F.; Wong, K.S.; Bousser, M.G.; CHIMES Study Investigators; de Silva, A. with 38 CHIMES Study Investigators
    BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Early vascular events are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the first 3 months after a stroke. We aimed to investigate the effects of MLC601 on the occurrence of early vascular events within 3 months of stroke onset. METHODS: Post hoc analysis was performed on data from subjects included in the CHInese Medicine Neuroaid Efficacy on Stroke recovery(CHIMES) study, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial that compared MLC601 with placebo in 1099 subjects with ischemic stroke of intermediate severity in the preceding 72 hours. Early vascular events were defined as a composite of recurrent stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and vascular death occurring within 3 months of stroke onset. RESULTS: The frequency of early vascular events during the 3-month follow-up was significantly less in the MLC601 group than in the placebo group (16 [2.9%] versus 31 events [5.6%]; risk difference=-2.7%; 95% confidence interval, -5.1% to -0.4%; P=0.025) without an increase in nonvascular deaths. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a difference in the risk of vascular outcomes between the 2 groups as early as the first month after stroke (Log-rank P=0.024; hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with MLC601 was associated with reduced early vascular events among subjects in the CHIMES study. The mechanisms for this effect require further study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00554723.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Primary care management of chronic constipation in Asia: the ANMA chronic constipation tool
    (The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 2013) Gwee, K.A.; Ghoshal, U.C.; Gonlachanvit, S.; Chua, A.S.; Myung, S.J.; Rajindrajith, S.; Patcharatrakul, T.; Choi, M.G.; Wu, J.C.; Chen, M.H.; Gong, X.R.; Lu, C.L.; Chen, C.L.; Pratap, N.; Abraham, P.; Hou, X.H.; Ke, M.; Ricaforte-Campos, J.D.; Syam, A.F.; Abdullah, M.
    Chronic constipation (CC) may impact on quality of life. There is substantial patient dissatisfaction; possible reasons are failure to recognize underlying constipation, inappropriate dietary advice and inadequate treatment. The aim of these practical guidelines intended for primary care physicians, and which are based on Asian perspectives, is to provide an approach to CC that is relevant to the existing health-care infrastructure. Physicians should not rely on infrequent bowel movements to diagnose CC as many patients have one or more bowel movement a day. More commonly, patients present with hard stool, straining, incomplete feeling, bloating and other dyspeptic symptoms. Physicians should consider CC in these situations and when patients are found to use laxative containing supplements. In the absence of alarm features physicians may start with a 2-4 week therapeutic trial of available pharmacological agents including osmotic, stimulant and enterokinetic agents. Where safe to do so, physicians should consider regular (as opposed to on demand dosing), combination treatment and continuous treatment for at least 4 weeks. If patients do not achieve satisfactory response, they should be referred to tertiary centers for physiological evaluation of colonic transit and pelvic floor function. Surgical referral is a last resort, which should be considered only after a thorough physiological and psychological evaluation. © The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility. All rights reserved.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Prognostic factors and pattern of long-term recovery with MLC601 (NeuroAiD™) in the chinese medicine neuroAiD efficacy on stroke recovery - extension study
    (Karger, 2017) Venketasubramanian, N.; Lee, C.F.; Young, S.H.; Tay, S.S.; Umapathi, T.; Lao, A.Y.; Gan, H.H.; Chua, C.L.; Wijekoon, N.; de Silva, H.A.; Hiyadan, J.H.; Suwanwela, N.C.; Wong, K.S.; Poungvarin, N.; Eow, G.B.; Chen, C.L.; CHIMES-E Study Investigators
    BACKGROUND: The Chinese Medicine NeuroAiD Efficacy on Stroke recovery - Extension (CHIMES-E) study is among the few acute stroke trials with long-term outcome data. We aimed to evaluate the recovery pattern and the influence of prognostic factors on treatment effect of MLC601 over 2 years. METHODS: The CHIMES-E study evaluated the 2 years outcome of subjects aged ≥18 years with acute ischemic stroke, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 6-14, pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤1 included in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of MLC601 for 3 months. Standard stroke care and rehabilitation were allowed during follow-up with mRS score being assessed in-person at month (M) 3 and by telephone at M1, M6, M12, M18 and M24. RESULTS: Data from 880 subjects were analyzed. There was no difference in baseline characteristics between treatment groups. The proportion of subjects with mRS score 0-1 increased over time in favor of MLC601 most notably from M3 to M6, thereafter remaining stable up to M24, while the proportion deteriorating to mRS score ≥2 remained low at all time points. Older age (p < 0.01), female sex (p = 0.06), higher baseline NIHSS score (p < 0.01) and longer onset to treatment time (OTT; p < 0.01) were found to be predictors of poorer outcome at M3. Greater treatment effect, with more subjects improving on MLC601 than placebo, was seen among subjects with 2 or more prognostic factors (OR 1.65 at M3, 1.78 at M6, 1.90 at M12, 1.65 at M18, 1.39 at M24), especially in subjects with more severe stroke or longer OTT. CONCLUSIONS: The sustained benefits of MLC601 over 2 years were due to more subjects improving to functional independence at M6 and beyond compared to placebo. Selection of subjects with poorer prognosis, particularly those with more severe NIHSS score and longer OTT delay, as well as a long follow-up period, may improve the power of future trials investigating the treatment effect of neuroprotective or neurorestorative therapies.